When a high-pressure natural gas transmission line erupted in San Bruno three years ago, the damage from the explosion and fire was horrific. Eight people were killed, 38 homes were reduced to ashes and hundreds of lives were ruptured forever.
This catastrophic event also exposed something else — a culture within Pacific Gas and Electric Co. that, as state investigators later concluded, “emphasized profits over safety.”
Federal investigators slammed PG&E for everything from shoddy welding to incomplete record-keeping to lax supervision of pipe inspections. Meanwhile, state auditors concluded that the company had diverted funds intended for pipeline safety and used them for such things as executive bonuses.
At the same time, one can hardly accuse the utility of being unresponsive in the aftermath of this catastrophe. Since the explosion and fire, PG&E has paid roughly $565 million to compensate victims and their families; $170 million to the city of San Bruno for rebuilding; and funded — through shareholders — more than $1 billion in infrastructure improvements.
Moreover, the company has acknowledged its mistakes and undergone a corporate shake-up, demonstrating its commitment to change.
Last week, the utility announced that it is nearing settlement on the last of its remaining claims. The big uncertainty at this point is what the penalty from the state will be.
Given the utility's willful disregard for public safety, it certainly needs to be substantial. But this summer, the staff of the state Public Utilities Commission came out with its recommendation — a breathtaking $2.25 billion penalty. This does not include the funds listed above in repairs, settlements and improvements. This would include an additional $1.95 billion for shareholder-funded modernization projects and a $300 million fine paid directly to the state of California.
PG&E and many in financial circles call the penalty excessive. They have a good argument.